Author: Veld Jan
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 0923-7992
Source: Open Economies Review, Vol.24, Iss.1, 2013-02, pp. : 147-163
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The global financial and economic crisis has revived the debate in the academic literature and in policy circles about the size and effectiveness of automatic fiscal stabilisers. Especially in the euro area where monetary policy is centralised and discretionary fiscal policy making is constrained by the EU fiscal rules, knowing the size and the effectiveness of automatic stabilisers is crucial. While automatic stabilisers are a fairly established concept in the fiscal policy literature, there is still no consensus about their actual nature and their effectiveness. This paper shows that differences in opinion mirror a deeper disagreement over how the budget would look like without automatic stabilisers. This issue is addressed by defining two types of counterfactual budgets giving rise to two different interpretations about the nature of automatic stabilisation. Simulations with a structural model confirm that the degree of smoothing is conditional on how the counterfactual budget, i.e. the budget without automatic stabilisers, is defined.
Related content
Fiscal Policy in Europe: How Effective Are Automatic Stabilisers?
By Brunila A.
Empirica, Vol. 30, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. :
Monetary and fiscal policy in the transition to EMU: what do SVAR models tell us?
Economic Modelling, Vol. 20, Iss. 5, 2003-09 ,pp. :
What Do Nongovernmental Organizations Do?
By Werker Eric Ahmed Faisal Z.
The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 22, Iss. 2, 2008-0 ,pp. :