Four types of research in the humanities: Setting the stage for research quality criteria in the humanities

ISSN： 1471-5449

Source： Research Evaluation, Vol.22, Iss.2, 2013-06, pp. : 79-92

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

This study presents humanities scholars conceptions of research and subjective notions of quality in the three disciplines German literature studies, English literature studies, and art history, captured using 21 Repertory Grid interviews. We identified three dimensions that structure the scholars conceptions of research: quality, time, and success. Further, the results revealed four types of research in the humanities: positively connoted traditional research (characterized as individual, discipline-oriented, and ground-breaking research), positively connoted modern research (cooperative, interdisciplinary, and socially relevant), negatively connoted traditional research (isolated, reproductive, and conservative), and negatively connoted modern research (career oriented, epigonal, calculated). In addition, 15 quality criteria for research in the three disciplines German literature studies, English literature studies, and art history were derived from the Repertory Grid interviews.