

Author: Castelo Daniel
Publisher: Brill
ISSN: 1745-5251
Source: Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Vol.21, Iss.1, 2012-01, pp. : 168-180
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This rejoinder responds to the recent exchange begun by Andrew Gabriel concerning the viability of divine impassibility within Pentecostal circles. The article hopes to make clearer the guiding assumptions and ends that drove the original article in question, particularly in terms of how the witness and reception of Christian tradition and the explicit and ongoing recognition of the analogical constitution of God-talk can further serve the efforts of constructive Pentecostal theology, particularly as they relate to the doctrine of God and divine attribution.
Related content


An Apologia for Divine Impassibility: Toward Pentecostal Prolegomena
Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2010-04 ,pp. :


Toward a Theology of Pentecostal Preaching
By Gordy John
Journal of Pentecostal Theology, Vol. 10, Iss. 1, 2001-10 ,pp. :


Spirit and Voice: Toward a Feminist Pentecostal Pneumatology
Pneuma, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 2007-11 ,pp. :


The Wedding At Cana (John II 1-11): a Pentecostal Meditation?
Novum Testamentum, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 1972-01 ,pp. :