

Author: Lacey Nicola
Publisher: Hart Publishing
ISSN: 2040-3313
Source: Jurisprudence, Vol.4, Iss.1, 2013-06, pp. : 1-19
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In this paper, the author suggest that the historical and institutional conditions of existence of the concepts which animate legal argumentation - like the historical and institutional conditions of existence of certain forms of law - are of interest not only in their own right, but also because they raise methodological issues for jurisprudence. These include questions about the relationship between concepts and the social phenomena which they purport to categorise; about the relationship between philosophical and other forms of legal theory; and about how a jurisprudence largely dominated by philosophical methods may be brought into productive dialogue with other forms of theoretical analysis. Only by broadening both its horizons and its methods, the author argues, will jurisprudence be capable of illuminating not only doctrinal analysis within particular jurisdictions at particular times, but also comparative and historical scholarship.
Related content


The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2014 Law and the Normativity of Obligation
By Pink Thomas
Jurisprudence, Vol. 5, Iss. 1, 2014-07 ,pp. :


The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2015—Means and Ends
Jurisprudence, Vol. 6, Iss. 1, 2015-05 ,pp. :


The Jurisprudence Annual Lecture 2012 Making Laws Better or Making Better Laws?
Jurisprudence, Vol. 3, Iss. 1, 2012-06 ,pp. :


By Green Leslie
Transnational Legal Theory, Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2012-07 ,pp. :


Contemporary German Criminal Jurisprudence
Peking University Law Journal, Vol. 1, Iss. 1, 2013-07 ,pp. :