

Author: Vigour Cécile
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1357-2334
Source: Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol.19, Iss.2, 2013-06, pp. : 219-245
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Legislative studies research often insists on the weakness of the French Parliament compared with the executive. Yet very little qualitative and quantitative empirical research has been done into the work of deputies in the French National Assembly, or into the institution's role in policy and law-making. This article addresses these research gaps by first analysing the characteristics and drivers of French MPs' involvement in law-making rather than in other parliamentary activities, either in the Parliament or in their constituency. Second, it takes an original approach by comparing MPs' perceptions of their activities with those of their electorate through the use of mixed-method analyses (open and closed questionnaires with 230 MPs; 13 focus groups with ordinary citizens). This is indeed a crucial issue in order to better understand the causes fuelling citizens' criticism of their representatives.
Related content


Normative Standards and Global Law-Making
By Mak Vanessa
Tilburg Law Review: Journal of International and European Law, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2012-01 ,pp. :


Conciliation procedure in the European Law-making process
Journal of Legislative Studies, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2006-03 ,pp. :




Law-Making as a Strategy for Change: Indonesia’s New Village Law
Asian Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2017-09 ,pp. :