Research Misconduct and The Scientific process: Continuing Quality Improvement

ISSN： 0898-9621

Source： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol.13, Iss.3, 2006-07, pp. : 225-246

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Research Misconduct Policies of Scientific Journals

By RESNIK DAVID

Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 16, Iss. 5, 2009-09 ,pp. : 254-267

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Dealing with Misconduct in Biomedical Research: A Review of the Problems and the Proposed Methods for Improvement

By KUMAR MALHAR

Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 16, Iss. 6, 2009-11 ,pp. : 307-330

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct

By Redman Barbara

Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, Iss. 3, 2005-07 ,pp. : 157-162

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Failure to Replicate: A Sign of Scientific Misconduct?

By Hill Helene Z. Pitt Joel H.

Publications, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2014-09 ,pp. : 71-82

MDPI

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Role of Culture in Research Misconduct

By Davis M.

Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2003-07 ,pp. : 189-201

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite