Author: Towse A.
Publisher: Adis International
ISSN: 1170-7690
Source: PharmacoEconomics, Vol.13, Iss.3, 1998-03, pp. : 271-276
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Parallel trade in pharmaceuticals has become a major European Union policy issue with several solutions being considered by the European Commission, Member State governments and the pharmaceutical industry in the Bangemann Process. This paper discusses the issues from an economic and public policy perspective - considering the economic cases for differential pricing and for Euro-prices, concluding that the economic case for parallel trade - to achieve convergence of prices - is not applicable to pharmaceuticals. It argues that health economic evaluation is not an appropriate tool to set Euro-prices because of differences in clinical practice and in resource use and cost across countries. Pricing rules should reflect local willingness to pay for innovation. It concludes, however, that in the absence of policy changes there is a strong likelihood of companies refusing to supply new innovative products at low prices to traditionally low price countries in order to avoid parallel trade undermining prices obtained elsewhere in Europe, with significant implications for the welfare of patients in those countries.
Related content
The pros and cons of Rx-to-OTC switching of drugs in the US
PharmacoEconomics and Outcomes News, Vol. 1, Iss. 474, 2005-01 ,pp. :
The pros and cons of Rx-to-OTC switching of drugs in the US
Inpharma, Vol. 1, Iss. 1480-1481, 2005-01 ,pp. :
Pros and Cons for the Development of New Antiepileptic Drugs
By Bialer M.
CNS Drugs, Vol. 16, Iss. 5, 2002-01 ,pp. :
Nano Anti-Cancer Drugs: Pros and Cons and Future Perspectives
Current Cancer Drug Targets, Vol. 11, Iss. 2, 2011-02 ,pp. :