Author: Wertheimer A.I. Chaney N.M.
Publisher: Adis International
ISSN: 1173-8790
Source: Disease Management & Health Outcomes, Vol.10, Iss.12, 2002-01, pp. : 743-748
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Clinical guidelines are controversial devices. While some are objective, current, evidence-based and of excellent quality, others are biased, consensus-based, obsolete and lack quality assurance effort. The problem for the clinician is determining which is which. There are no international organizations overseeing standards and expirations of clinical guidelines internationally.This situation is discussed in the current article as well as the need for a recurring review process so that a safe and effective protocol will have to pass a rigorous evaluation on a periodic basis. Without this periodic review, a protocol could be effective one week and outdated the following week.Even though finely crafted evidence-based protocols enhance quality and can lead toward optimal, cost-effective therapy, practitioners are reluctant to adopt guidelines that are of unknown origins, age and without the benefit of an objective peer-review process.
Related content
Disease Management and the Application of Privacy Guidelines
By Regan M.
Disease Management & Health Outcomes, Vol. 10, Iss. 9, 2002-01 ,pp. :