Author: Greselin Francesca
Publisher: Taylor & Francis Ltd
ISSN: 1360-0532
Source: Journal of Applied Statistics, Vol.40, Iss.2, 2013-02, pp. : 282-297
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The current financial turbulence in Europe inspires and perhaps requires researchers to rethink how to measure incomes, wealth, and other parameters of interest to policy-makers and others. The noticeable increase in disparities between less and more fortunate individuals suggests that measures based upon comparing the incomes of less fortunate with the mean of the entire population may not be adequate. The classical Gini and related indices of economic inequality, however, are based exactly on such comparisons. It is because of this reason that in this paper we explore and contrast the classical Gini index with a new Zenga index, the latter being based on comparisons of the means of less and more fortunate sub-populations, irrespectively of the threshold that might be used to delineate the two sub-populations. The empirical part of the paper is based on the 2001 wave of the European Community Household Panel data set provided by EuroStat. Even though sample sizes appear to be large, we supplement the estimated Gini and Zenga indices with measures of variability in the form of normal, t-bootstrap, and bootstrap bias-corrected and accelerated confidence intervals.
Related content
On the Gini Mean Difference Test for Circular Data
Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, Vol. 42, Iss. 11, 2013-06 ,pp. :
A vector valued bivariate gini index for truncated distributions
By Abdul-Sathar E. Suresh R. Nair K.
Statistical Papers, Vol. 48, Iss. 4, 2007-10 ,pp. :