A two-year study of the new cyclosporine formulation consupren in De Novo Renal transplant patients

By Stephan A.G.   Barbari A.   Masri M.   Kamel G.   Barakat Khoury W.   Karam A.   Mokhbat J.   Kilany H.  

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 30, Iss. 7, 1998-11 ,pp. : 3563-3564

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with mycophenolate mofetil versus cyclosporine with mycophenolate mofetil in cadaveric renal transplant recipients with delayed graft function

By Liu B.   Lin Z.B.   Ming C.S.   Zhang W.J.   Chen Z.S.   Sha B.   Zeng F.J.   Chen S.  

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2003-02 ,pp. : 87-88

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Renal Function in Primary Liver Transplant Recipients Receiving Neoral (Cyclosporine) Versus Prograf (Tacrolimus)

By Van Buren D.   Payne J.   Geevarghese S.   MacDonell R.   Chapman W.   Wright J.K.   Helderman J.H.   Richie R.   Pinson C.W.  

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 30, Iss. 4, 1998-06 ,pp. : 1401-1402

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cardiovascular risk profile in nondiabetic renal transplant patients: cyclosporine versus tacrolimus

By Hernandez D.   Alvarez A.   Torres A.   Oppenheimer F.   Cobo M.   Gonzalez-Posada J.   Jimenez A.   Lorenzo V.   Torregrosa V.  

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 35, Iss. 5, 2003-08 ,pp. : 1727-1729

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A three arm study comparing immediate tacrolimus therapy with ATG induction therapy followed by either tacrolimus or cyclosporine in adult renal transplant recipients

By Charpentier B.   European Tacrolimus vs Microemulsified Cyclosporin Study Group  

Transplantation Proceedings, Vol. 34, Iss. 5, 2002-08 ,pp. : 1625-1626

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite