Integration after adaptation to transparent motion: static and dynamic test patterns result in different aftereffect directions

Author： Verstraten F.A.J.   van der Smagt M.J.   Fredericksen R.E.   van de Grind W.A.  

Publisher： Elsevier

ISSN： 0042-6989

Source： Vision Research, Vol.39, Iss.4, 1998-02, pp. : 803-810

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Adaptation to Motion of a Second-order Pattern: the Motion Aftereffect is Not a General Result

By Cropper S.J.   Hammett S.T.  

Vision Research, Vol. 37, Iss. 16, 1997-08 ,pp. : 2247-2259

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Motion after-effect due to binocular sum of adaptation to linear motion

By Grunewald A.   Mingolla E.  

Vision Research, Vol. 38, Iss. 19, 1998-10 ,pp. : 2963-2971

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Motion Aftereffect after Monocular Adaptation to Filled-in Motion at the Blind Spot

By Murakami I.  

Vision Research, Vol. 35, Iss. 8, 1995-04 ,pp. : 1041-1045

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Motion Aftereffect with Flickering Test Patterns Reveals Higher Stages of Motion Processing

By Nishida S.   Sato T.  

Vision Research, Vol. 35, Iss. 4, 1995-02 ,pp. : 477-490

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Recovery from Adaptation for Dynamic and Static Motion Aftereffects: Evidence for Two Mechanisms

By Verstraten F.A.J.   Fredericksen R.E.   Van Wezel R.J.A.   Lankheet M.J.M.   Van de Grind W.A.  

Vision Research, Vol. 36, Iss. 3, 1996-02 ,pp. : 421-424

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite