Understanding some of the differences between the COD- and BOD-based models offered in STOAT

Author： Stokes A.J. West J.R. Forster C.F. Davies W.J.

Publisher： Elsevier

ISSN： 0043-1354

Source： Water Research, Vol.34, Iss.4, 2000-03, pp. : 1296-1306

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Response of BOD, COD and TOC of secondary effluents to chlorination

By El-Rehaili A.M.

Water Research, Vol. 29, Iss. 6, 1995-06 ,pp. : 1571-1577

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Process Design Implications due to Differences in Anaerobic COD Stabilization Models

By Kraemer Jeremy Constantine Tim Crawford George Erdal Zeynep Katehis Dimitri Johnson Bruce Daigger Glen

Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2008, Iss. 17, 2008-01 ,pp. : 119-125

Water Environment Federation

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

On BOD tests for the determination of biodegradable COD for Calibrating Activated Sludge Model No. 1

By Weijers S.R.

Water Science and Technology, Vol. 39, Iss. 4, 1999-01 ,pp. : 177-184

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Measurement of BOD: Correlation Between 5-Day BOD and Commercial BOD Biosensor Values

By Marty J L

Environmental Technology, Vol. 18, Iss. 3, 1997-03 ,pp. : 333-337

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Influence of High Levels of Total Suspended Solids on Measurement of Cod and Bod in the Yellow River, China

By Jingsheng Chen Tao Yu Ongley Edwin

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 116, Iss. 1-3, 2006-05 ,pp. : 321-334

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite