Is the two-hour evidentiary presumption in the context of drinking and driving cases a sufficiently compelling factor to override a suspect's right to counsel under South African law?

Author： de Villiers Wium  

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 0305-0718

Source： Commonwealth Law Bulletin, Vol.39, Iss.1, 2013-03, pp. : 119-141

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Hybrid Texts and Uniform Law? The Multilingual Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union

By McAuliffe Karen  

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 24, Iss. 1, 2011-03 ,pp. : 97-115

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Above the Law? A Comparative Study of National Prosecutions of Heads of State

By Reyes Napoleon  

Critical Criminology, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2011-03 ,pp. : 43-73

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

'Scientific Whaling': Whither Sanctions for Non-Compliance with International Law?

By Sand Peter H.  

The Finnish Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2008-01 ,pp. : 93-124

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

European Court of Human Rights and the Quality of Legislation: Shifting to a Substantial Concept of 'Law'?

By Lupo Nicola   Piccirilli Giovanni  

Legisprudence, Vol. 6, Iss. 2, 2012-10 ,pp. : 229-242

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Fingerprint Comparison Evidence Has Been Under Sustained Attack in the United States of America for the Last Number of Years: Is the Critique with Regard to Reliability Sufficiently Penetrating to Warrant the Exclusion of This Valuable Evidence?

By Villiers Wium D.e.  

Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, Vol. 12, Iss. 2, 2012-03 ,pp. : 317-340

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite