

Author: Daidone Maria Grazia Zaffaroni Nadia Cappelletti Vera
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1052-6773
Source: Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, Vol.2011, Iss.43, 2011-10, pp. : 55-59
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Despite the progress in understanding breast cancer biology, translation of basic findings into clinical applications still appears to be a complex process, and few molecular markers/signatures are in routine clinical use or currently challenged for their clinical utility. Disease complexity, certainly, represents an obstacle to successful translation, but methodological pitfalls in development and validation steps also contribute. Translational research should be planned as a round-trip from the bench to the bedside and back. The preoperative/neoadjuvant setting represents an ideal model because it allows identification and validation of treatment response predictors and of pharmacodynamic markers associated with clinical downstaging, investigations on in vivo action mechanism of drugs, and indirect validation of findings from preclinical models. Availability of well-annotated, high-quality biospecimens; standardized, reproducible, and robust assays to detect molecular markers/signatures even on few cells; prospective planning of study design; and regulatory issues adequately fitting preclinical and clinical needs represent fundamental assets for translational studies.
Related content




Surgical Staging of Endometrial Cancer: Does the Patient Benefit?
By Orr J.W.
Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 71, Iss. 3, 1998-12 ,pp. :


Thymic malignancy in a breast cancer patient
By Oyan Başak Aksoy Sercan Yavas Ozlem Kars Ayse Turker Alev Barista Ibrahim
Acta Oncologica, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. :


Is physiotherapy useful to the breast cancer patient?
Acta Oncologica, Vol. 44, Iss. 5, 2005-07 ,pp. :