

Author: Basrur Rajesh
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1465-332x
Source: Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol.67, Iss.2, 2013-04, pp. : 176-189
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
As the USA and Russia seek to reduce their nuclear arsenals en route to universal disarmament, they are hamstrung by the lack of a doctrinal basis for minimum deterrence. The cold war debate between Albert Wohlstetter and Patrick Blackett remains valid today. Though Wohlstetter's ideas, which produced large arsenals, remain influential, an examination of the history of nuclear rivalries shows that Blackett's thinking-offering security with more compact arsenals-is closer to reality. The minimalist doctrines and practices of China, India and, to a lesser extent, Pakistan offer useful lessons for the USA and Russia. But the Asian powers themselves need to iron out the inconsistencies in their thinking, which harbours elements of Wohlstetter's thought, if they are to be truly useful models that the bigger powers can emulate.
Related content


India and Pakistan: Towards greater bilateral stability
Strategic Survey, Vol. 104, Iss. 1, 2004-05 ,pp. :


The evolution of the EU-Japan relationship: towards a `normative partnership'?
Japan Forum, Vol. 24, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. :






China-Japan Relations in the Post-Koizumi Era: a Brightening Half-decade?
Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 19, Iss. 1, 2012-05 ,pp. :