

Author: Dempsey Deborah
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1469-9915
Source: New Genetics & Society, Vol.32, Iss.1, 2013-03, pp. : 37-53
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Intentionally planned parenthood by gay male couples through commercial and altruistic surrogacy is gaining momentum in Australia and abroad. Very little is known about this group of male parents, including the relational considerations important to them in forming families through surrogacy. This paper, based on in-depth interviews with six Australian gay male couples who utilized altruistic surrogacy in the state of Victoria, and commercial surrogacy arrangements in the US, considers the meaning and management of biogenetic paternity in the creation of their family relationships. Despite the extent to which participants underplayed the importance of paternal biological connections in creating or defining the meaning of family, biogenetic paternity remains an important kinship resource that must be carefully managed - emotionally and socially - in creating and maintaining couple, parent-child and extended family relationships. First, there was a keen emotional significance attributed to the biogenetic connection for some men in the context of their own family history and lineage. Second, the careful management of information and sharing or alternating sperm provision constituted an attempt by couples to thwart speculation among friends, family members and acquaintances about the identity of the biogenetic father. Third, despite some interest in sharing sperm provision in the interests of symbolically establishing shared parenthood, explicit knowledge of biogenetic paternity through DNA paternity testing was regarded as an important kinship and identity resource for children as they grow up. The paper concludes that when gay male couples form families through commercial or altruistic surrogacy, a range of symbols and metaphors conventional to heteronormative nuclear family formation are in play in this ostensibly unconventional context.
Related content




Transnational Surrogacy and the Justice Condition of Nonexploitation
By Panitch Vida
American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 14, Iss. 5, 2014-05 ,pp. :


Cultural Influences on Transnational Gestational Surrogacy
By Zivotofsky Ari Z. Loike John D.
American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 14, Iss. 5, 2014-05 ,pp. :


Transnational Gestational Surrogacy: Exploitative or Empowering?
American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 14, Iss. 5, 2014-05 ,pp. :


Contractual Duties in Research, Surrogacy, and Stem Cell Donation
American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2011-04 ,pp. :