Discussion paper: how much of commonsense and legal reasoning is formalizable? A review of conceptual obstacles

ISSN： 1470-8396

Source： Law, Probability and Risk, Vol.11, Iss.2-3, 2012-06, pp. : 225-245

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

How clear is transparent? Reporting expert reasoning in legal cases

By Sjerps Marjan J. Berger Charles E.H.

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 317-329

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Liar Paradox in Legal Reasoning

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 29, Iss. 2, 1971-11 ,pp. : 275-291

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Judicial Review: How Much is Too Much? A View of Eba, Cart and MR (Pakistan) from the Asylum and Immigration Perspective

By Craig Sarah

Edinburgh Law Review, Vol. 16, Iss. 2, 2012-5 ,pp. : 210-223

Edinburgh University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Four Alleged Paradoxes in Legal Reasoning

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 38, Iss. 2, 1979-11 ,pp. : 373-391

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Discussion paper: A just measure of probability

By Ligertwood Andrew Edmond Gary

Law, Probability and Risk, Vol. 11, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. : 365-369

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite