Author： Granek Leeat
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 1532-5032
Source： Journal of Loss and Trauma, Vol.18, Iss.3, 2013-05, pp. : 275-288
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In the last few decades, grief and loss research in the psychological domain has focused almost exclusively on its dysfunctional nature. I examine what is underneath these questions about pathology and suggest that our discipline is suffering from an attachment wound where we have dissociated from our historical roots when it comes to the study of grief and loss. I argue that we need to ask new questions about grief and loss and present two examples of my collaborative work to illustrate innovative ways of thinking about and researching grief.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
By Palmer Bob
European Eating Disorders Review, Vol. 13, Iss. 4, 2005-07 ,pp. :
Is the truth table task mistaken?
By Sevenants Aline Dieussaert Kristien Schaeken Walter
Thinking & Reasoning, Vol. 18, Iss. 2, 2012-05 ,pp. :
Repetition priming: Is music special?
By Bigand E.
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, Vol. 58, Iss. 8, 2005-01 ,pp. :
Discourse Analysis: Terminable or Interminable?
By Hook Derek
Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2013-07 ,pp. :