Author： Piccinini Gualtiero
Publisher： Springer Publishing Company
ISSN： 0039-7857
Source： Synthese, Vol.153, Iss.3, 2006-12, pp. : 343-353
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
According to some philosophers, computational explanation is proprietary to psychology—it does not belong in neuroscience. But neuroscientists routinely offer computational explanations of cognitive phenomena. In fact, computational explanation was initially imported from computability theory into the science of mind by neuroscientists, who justified this move on neurophysiological grounds. Establishing the legitimacy and importance of computational explanation in neuroscience is one thing; shedding light on it is another. I raise some philosophical questions pertaining to computational explanation and outline some promising answers that are being developed by a number of authors.
Related content
Social explanation and computational simulation
By Sawyer Keith
Philosophical Explorations, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 2004-09 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Synthese, Vol. 141, Iss. 2, 2004-08 ,pp. :