No-incision (NOTES) versus single-incision (single-port) surgery for access to sites of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a back-to-back animal study

Author： Ladjici Yamina

Publisher： Springer Publishing Company

ISSN： 0930-2794

Source： Surgical Endoscopy, Vol.26, Iss.9, 2012-09, pp. : 2658-2666

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Conventional Techniques

By Johal KS Tsim P Redfern A Weeks C Park HM Morris C Kang P Maxwell-Armstrong C

Bulletin of The Royal College of Surgeons of England, Vol. 94, Iss. 10, 2012-11 ,pp. : 348-350

The Royal College of Surgeons of England

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Transvaginal cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective cohort study

By Solomon Daniel

Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 26, Iss. 10, 2012-10 ,pp. : 2823-2827

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Laparoscopic Versus Single-Incision Cholecystectomy

By Khambaty Fatima

World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 35, Iss. 5, 2011-05 ,pp. : 967-972

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A prospective study comparing three-port video-assisted thoracoscopy with the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) port and instruments for the video thoracoscopic approach: a pilot study

By Mier José Chavarin Abraham Izquierdo-Vidal Cristina Fibla Juan Molins Laureano

Surgical Endoscopy, Vol. 27, Iss. 7, 2013-07 ,pp. : 2557-2560

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Case–control Study of Single-Incision Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

By Chang Stephen

World Journal of Surgery, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2011-02 ,pp. : 289-293

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite