Reply to Mishler, Harney, and Roediger: Production, class, race … and labor as subject

ISSN： 0304-4092

Source： Dialectical Anthropology, Vol.34, Iss.2, 2010-06, pp. : 283-286

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Labor mobility versus class mobilization?

By Berghahn Journals Oscar

Focaal, Vol. 2008, Iss. 51, 2008-06 ,pp. : 5-6

Berghahn Books

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Cell phones, complicity, and class politics in the Philippine labor diaspora

By Berghahn Journals Pauline Gardiner

Focaal, Vol. 2008, Iss. 51, 2008-06 ,pp. : 28-42

Berghahn Books

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Comment on De Genova's “Management of quality”: Race-thinking at the point of production

By Roediger David

Dialectical Anthropology, Vol. 34, Iss. 2, 2010-06 ,pp. : 273-276

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

American dreams and Brazilian racial democracy: The making of race and class in Brazil and the United States

By Berghahn Journals Sean T.

Focaal, Vol. 2015, Iss. 73, 2015-12 ,pp. : 41-54

Berghahn Books

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reflections on reflections: dialectical commentaries on gender and class in NTAE production

By Chollett Donna

Dialectical Anthropology, Vol. 35, Iss. 2, 2011-05 ,pp. : 187-194

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite