Author： Lindberg Erik
Publisher： Routledge Ltd
ISSN： 0358-5522
Source： Scandinavian Economic History Review, Vol.57, Iss.2, 2009-06, pp. : 191-206
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to examine the effects of the great naval blockade on the Swedish salt market during the Great Northern War (1700-1721). Whether or not salt can be perceived as a strategic good subject of wartime shortage is important in interpreting the reasons behind the famous Swedish Navigation Act of 1724. New research claims that the Navigation Act was a welfare enhancing institution, as it helped to secure salt imports. This essay shows that although Sweden was at war with most European Great Powers and the subject of sea blockades during the Great Northern War, the salt market still worked remarkably well. Neither supply nor salt movements show any signs of a great crisis. Thus, there was no need to secure salt imports during the period of peace that followed. Consequently, the Swedish Navigation Act had little to do with welfare but more with rent seeking and monopolies on the freight market.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
