Author: Foss L.
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1386-7415
Source: Theoretical Medicine, Vol.19, Iss.6, 1998-12, pp. : 621-644
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
An examination of the early history of Nobel Committee deliberations, coupled with a survey of discoveries for which prizes have been awarded to date – and, equally revealing, discoveries for which prizes have not been awarded – reveals a pattern. This pattern suggests that Committee members may have internalized the received, biomedical model and conferred awards in accord with the physicalistic premises that ground this model. I consider the prospect of a paradigm change in medical science and the possible repercussions of such a change on the distribution of Nobel prizes ``within the domain of physiology or medicine.'' For expository purposes, I contrast a model based on a science of pathophysiology with one based on a science of pathopsychophysiology. I propose a means whereby members might minimize the potentially blinding effects of model-dependence and come to evaluate medical discoveries from an inter-model rather than an exclusively intra-model perspective. By bringing to light questions rarely asked and proposing answers, I seek to open a dialogue and furnish a vehicle by which the putative delimiting effects of model-dependence might be overcome.
Related content
Body clocks: Time for the Nobel Prize
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 222, Iss. 2, 2018-02 ,pp. :
Ernest H. Starling and the Nobel Prize
Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Vol. 63, Iss. 4, 2003-01 ,pp. :
By Heath Iona
British Journal of General Practice, Vol. 55, Iss. 521, 2005-12 ,pp. :