Reconstructing and Evaluating Genetic Arguments in Judicial Decisions

ISSN： 0920-427X

Source： Argumentation, Vol.19, Iss.4, 2005-11, pp. : 447-458

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Reconstructing Complex Analogy Argumentation in Judicial Decisions: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective

By Kloosterhuis Harm

Argumentation, Vol. 19, Iss. 4, 2005-11 ,pp. : 471-483

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Effects of Moral and Pragmatic Arguments Against Torture on Demands for Judicial Reform

POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 39, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. : 143-162

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Profiles of Dialogue for Evaluating Arguments from Ignorance

By Walton D.

Argumentation, Vol. 13, Iss. 1, 1999-02 ,pp. : 53-71

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Evaluating Arguments Based on Toulmin’s Scheme

By Verheij Bart

Argumentation, Vol. 19, Iss. 3, 2005-12 ,pp. : 347-371

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Eveline T. Feteris, Fundamental of Legal Argumentation: A Survey of Theories of Justification of Judicial Decisions (1999)

By Twining W.

Argumentation, Vol. 15, Iss. 2, 2001-05 ,pp. : 223-229

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite