Author： Haesselbarth Werner
Publisher： Springer Publishing Company
ISSN： 0949-1775
Source： Accreditation and Quality Assurance, Vol.9, Iss.8, 2004-07, pp. : 509-514
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Generic issues and current approaches in the evaluation of bias studies with respect to estimation of measurement uncertainty are discussed, focusing on two main scenarios. In the first, for a within-laboratory assessment of a fully developed uncertainty budget, bias studies are carried out to verify the pre-established performance of a measurement procedure, and design corrective actions if necessary. In the second scenario, for an estimation of measurement uncertainty from within-laboratory validation data, bias studies are carried out to “calibrate” the whole measurement procedure and evaluate its performance, more specifically to estimate the uncertainty of measurement by combination of bias and precision estimates.
Related content
Analytical Bias: the Neglected Component of Measurement Uncertainty
By Kane Jean S.
The Analyst, Vol. 1997, Iss. 11, 1997-11 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
Measurement Uncertainty Estimation in Amperometric Sensors: A Tutorial Review
By Helm Irja Jalukse Lauri Leito Ivo
Sensors, Vol. 10, Iss. 5, 2010-04 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Measurement Uncertainty Estimation of a Robust Photometer Circuit
By Hernandez Wilmar de Vicente Jesús
Sensors, Vol. 9, Iss. 4, 2009-04 ,pp. :