Not to decide is to decide: ignoring susceptibility is not `good science'

Publisher： Elsevier

ISSN： 1382-6689

Source： Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol.4, Iss.3, 1997-12, pp. : 219-227

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Denosumab STANDs to give patients FREEDOM to DECIDE

Inpharma, Vol. 1, Iss. 1657, 2008-01 ,pp. : 7-8

Adis International

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Ethical dilemmas: should scientists, God or lawyers decide?

By Walker Timothy

Clinical Medicine, Vol. 1, Iss. 5, 2001-09 ,pp. : 383-384

Royal College Of Physicians

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Antidepressants or counselling: let the patient decide?

Inpharma, Vol. 1, Iss. 1282, 2001-01 ,pp. : 12-12

Adis International

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The use of information on susceptibility in risk assessment: state of the science and potential for improvement

By Beck B.D.

Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 4, Iss. 3, 1997-12 ,pp. : 229-234

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Apoptosis: ignoring morphology and focusing on biochemical mechanisms will not eliminate confusion

By Fujikawa D.G.

Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, Vol. 23, Iss. 7, 2002-07 ,pp. : 309-310

Elsevier

Access to resources Recommend Favorite