

Author: Aronsson Marianne Gamberale-Stille Gabriella
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 1465-7279
Source: Behavioral Ecology, Vol.24, Iss.2, 2013-11, pp. : 349-354
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
It has been suggested that the common existence of regular patterning in aposematic prey animals makes them “stand out from the background, improving detection and recognition. Another suggestion is that internal patterns could have a similar positive effect on predator aversion learning as prey-to-background contrast. We used wild caught blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and artificial prey signals to investigate if internal color boundaries, pattern regularity and pattern symmetry affect learning. Birds in different treatments were trained, on a complex background, to discriminate between artificial prey with different nonrewarding color stimuli with a black pattern and rewarding stimuli without a black pattern, followed by a generalization test. This study provides evidence of learning benefits to internally contrasting patterns as the striped prey stimuli were learned faster than the unstriped. Also, we found no beneficial effects of pattern regularity and symmetry. The birds generalized more between prey with different black patterns than to the profitable prey, suggesting that color is of foremost importance. The generalization test also showed a greater avoidance of striped than that of unstriped prey, suggesting some attention on patterns. Thus, internal patterning may affect signal salience and in some circumstances benefit prey due to both a faster avoidance learning and generalization behavior.
Related content






Keeping the band together: evidence for false boundary disruptive coloration in a butterfly
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 1010-061X, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. :




Warning Signal Efficacy: Assessing the Effects of Color, Iridescence, and Time of Day in the Field
ETHOLOGY, Vol. 121, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. :