A Critical Examination of Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules, 2006

ISSN： 1660-7112

Source： The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol.13, Iss.3, 2012-01, pp. : 486-501

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The arbitration of whistleblower cases

By Masucci Deborah

Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 4, Iss. 4, 2004-01 ,pp. : 46-48

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Arbitration's status under EU law

By Zekos Georgios I.

The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 13, Iss. 3, 2012-01 ,pp. : 390-419

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

International Arbitration Cases Involving Kazakhstan

SourceOECD Transition Economies, Vol. 2012, Iss. 1, 2012-04 ,pp. : 119-120

OECD Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Arbitration of investment disputes under Iranian investment treaties

By Atai Ardeshir

Journal of Money Laundering Control, Vol. 14, Iss. 2, 2011-05 ,pp. : 130-157

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Agreed Settlement v. Unfavourable Award in Investment Arbitration

By Voitovich Sergey A.

The Journal of World Investment & Trade, Vol. 13, Iss. 5, 2012-01 ,pp. : 718-728

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite