Author: Husak Douglas
Publisher: Springer Publishing Company
ISSN: 1871-9791
Source: Criminal Law and Philosophy, Vol.5, Iss.2, 2011-06, pp. : 199-218
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Commentators seemingly agree about what negligence is</i>—and how it is contrasted from recklessness. They also appear to concur about whether particular examples (both real and hypothetical) portray negligence. I am less confident about each of these matters. I explore the distinction between recklessness and negligence by examining a type of case that has generated a good deal of critical discussion: those in which a defendant forgets</i> that he has created a substantial and unjustifiable risk of harm. Even in this limited kind of example, no single perspective on blame and liability proves to be defensible. Nonetheless, a discussion of this type of case is helpful because it enables us to appreciate the difficulties in understanding the nature of negligence and the ensuing uncertainty about whether penal liability for negligence is ever warranted.
Related content
A Case for Criminal Negligence
Law and Philosophy, Vol. 29, Iss. 4, 2010-07 ,pp. :
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 43, Iss. 1, 1984-04 ,pp. :
Liability in negligence for economic loss
Industrial Relations Law Bulletin, Vol. 737, Iss. 1, 2004-05 ,pp. :
NEGLIGENCE LIABILITY FOR OMISSIONS AND THE POLICE
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 75, Iss. 1, 2016-03 ,pp. :
Negligence—Standard of Care—Vicarious Liability
Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 1955-11 ,pp. :