Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2  (01-2014)

Period of time： 2014年2期

Publisher： John Benjamins Publishing Company

Founded in： 2012

Total resources： 20

E-ISSN： 2211-4750|3|2

ISSN： 2211-4742

Subject： C93 Management

Favorite

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2

Menu

“Our reading would lead to…”

By Mazzi Davide in (2014)

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 103-125

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Negotiating scientific ethos in academic controversy

By Livnat Zohar in (2014)

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 126-152

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A functional analysis of the 2010 Australian Prime Minister debate

By Benoit William,Benoit-Bryan Jennifer M. in (2014)

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 153-168

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Analogical reasoning in public health

By Cummings Louise in (2014)

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 169-197

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Frans H. van Eemeren and Bart Garssen (2012). Exploring Argumentative Contexts

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 199-218

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Christian Dahlman and Eveline Feteris (2013). Legal Argumentation Theory: Cross Disciplinary Perspectives

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 219-223

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Serena Tomasi (2011). Teorie dell’argomentazione e processo penale. Un’analisi comparata delle principali teorie argomentative contemporanee con profili applicativi al processo penale

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 224-227

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Damiano Canale and Giovanni Tuzet (2009). The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy.

Journal of Argumentation in Context,volume 3,issue 2 , Vol. 3, Iss. 2, 2014-01 , pp. 228-230

John Benjamins Publishing Company

Abstract Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Total 8 item(s)