Comparison between stimulated in-vitro fertilization and stimulated intrauterine insemination for the treatment of unexplained and mild male factor infertility

Author： Zayed F.  

Publisher： Oxford University Press

ISSN： 1460-2350

Source： Human Reproduction, Vol.12, Iss.11, 1997-12, pp. : 2408-2413

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Stimulated intra‐uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility

By Stewart Jane A.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, Iss. 5, 2003-05 ,pp. : 903-907

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Stimulated intra‐uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility

By Collins John  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, Iss. 5, 2003-05 ,pp. : 907-912

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Stimulated intra‐uterine insemination is not a natural choice for the treatment of unexplained subfertility

By Hughes Edward G.  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 18, Iss. 5, 2003-05 ,pp. : 912-914

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The case for initial treatment with intrauterine insemination as opposed to in vitro fertilization for idiopathic infertility

By Homburg Roy  

Human Fertility, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 2003-01 ,pp. : 122-124

Informa Healthcare

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Sperm treatment with extracellular ATP increases fertilization rates in in-vitro fertilization for male factor infertility

By Rossato M  

Human Reproduction, Vol. 14, Iss. 3, 1999-03 ,pp. : 694-697

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite