Decision-making differences between big six and non-big six auditing firms: the implications for the internal audit function

Author： Anandarajan Asokan Kleinman Gary

Publisher： Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

ISSN： 0268-6902

Source： Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.15, Iss.6, 2000-06, pp. : 295-305

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The images of the Big Six audit firms in the Czech Republic

By Sucher Pat Moizer Peter Zarova Marcela

European Accounting Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 3, 1999-09 ,pp. : 499-521

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The application of business risk audit methodology within non-Big-4 firms

By Kutum Imad Fraser Ian Hussainey Khaled

Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2015-10 ,pp. : 226-246

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An empirical investigation of the use of ISA 520 "analytical procedures" among Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audit firms in Egypt

By Samaha Khaled Hegazy Mohamed

Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25, Iss. 9, 2010-10 ,pp. : 882-911

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A cross-sectional examination of non-Big 4 firms’ reliability

Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 30, Iss. 6-7, 2015-07 ,pp. : 633-656

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Openness to context-based research: the gulf between the claims and actions of Big Six firms in the USA

By Gendron Yves

Accounting Auditing and Accountability, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2000-02 ,pp. : 175-196

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite