A cross-sectional examination of non-Big 4 firms’ reliability

Publisher： Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

E-ISSN： 1758-7735|30|6-7|633-656

ISSN： 0268-6902

Source： Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol.30, Iss.6-7, 2015-07, pp. : 633-656

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The application of business risk audit methodology within non-Big-4 firms

By Kutum Imad   Fraser Ian   Hussainey Khaled  

Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 13, Iss. 2, 2015-10 ,pp. : 226-246

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An empirical investigation of the use of ISA 520 "analytical procedures" among Big 4 versus non-Big 4 audit firms in Egypt

By Samaha Khaled   Hegazy Mohamed  

Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 25, Iss. 9, 2010-10 ,pp. : 882-911

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Decision-making differences between big six and non-big six auditing firms: the implications for the internal audit function

By Anandarajan Asokan   Kleinman Gary  

Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 15, Iss. 6, 2000-06 ,pp. : 295-305

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

An empirical comparison of non-Big 4 and Big 4 auditors' perceptions of auditor independence

By Law Philip  

Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 23, Iss. 9, 2008-10 ,pp. : 917-934

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Investigating audit quality among Big 4 Malaysian firms

By Carlin Tyrone M.   Finch Nigel   Laili Nur Hidayah  

Asian Review of Accounting, Vol. 17, Iss. 2, 2009-07 ,pp. : 96-114

Emerald Group Publishing Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite