A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial

Author： Nelson Robert

Publisher： Routledge Ltd

ISSN： 1536-0075

Source： American Journal of Bioethics, Vol.11, Iss.6, 2011-06, pp. : 14-16

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk

By Shah Seema

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 22-23

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa

By Slack Catherine

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 21-22

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Is There an Ethical Obligation to Disclose Controversial Risk? A Question From the ACCORD Trial

By DeMarco Joseph P. Ford Paul J. Patton Dana J. Stewart Douglas O.

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 14, Iss. 4, 2014-04 ,pp. : 4-10

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Minimal Risk Remains an Open Question

By Binik Ariella Weijer Charles Sheehan Mark

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 25-27

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Handedness in Children of Schizophrenic Parents: Data from Three High-risk Studies

By Erlenmeyer-Kimling L.

Behavior Genetics, Vol. 35, Iss. 3, 2005-05 ,pp. : 351-358

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite