The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk

ISSN： 1536-0075

Source： American Journal of Bioethics, Vol.11, Iss.6, 2011-06, pp. : 22-23

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

A Relative Standard for Minimal Risk is Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful to Children: Lessons from the Phambili Trial

By Nelson Robert

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 14-16

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa

By Slack Catherine

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 21-22

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Minimal Risk Remains an Open Question

By Binik Ariella Weijer Charles Sheehan Mark

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 25-27

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Uniqueness, Exploitation, and Relative Risk Standards in Adolescent Research

By Malek Janet

American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 11, Iss. 6, 2011-06 ,pp. : 23-25

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Expectation Maximization Algorithm Based Haplotype Relative Risk (EM-HRR): Test of Linkage Disequilibrium Using Incomplete Case-Parents Trios

Human Heredity, Vol. 59, Iss. 3, 2005-06 ,pp. : 125-135

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite