Author： Lahman Maria Geist Monica Rodriguez Katrina Graglia Pamela DeRoche Kathryn
Publisher： Springer Publishing Company
ISSN： 0033-5177
Source： Quality and Quantity, Vol.45, Iss.6, 2011-10, pp. : 1397-1414
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In this article, the authors define ethics, discuss why researchers should care about ethics, and briefly review the history of ethics and the surrounding contemporary debate as related to research, the development of research ethics codes, research ethics legislation, and the formation of the human subjects research review boards in the West with an emphasis on the United States’ Institutional Review Board. They then explicate the difference between minimalist ethical codes, which all respected researchers must adhere to, and an aspirational ethical stance. Culturally Responsive Relational Reflexive Ethics (CRRRE) is then advanced as a viable aspirational ethical stance for the research community. Finally, the authors draw on their own research for examples of ethical dilemmas involving ethnicity, age, sexual orientation, and power that CRRRE has helped illuminate.
Related content
Access to resources
Recommend
Effective Schooling is Being Culturally Responsive
Intercultural Education, Vol. 12, Iss. 1, 2001-04 ,pp. :
The Diversity Imperative: building a culturally responsive school ethos
Intercultural Education, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, 2003-03 ,pp. :
Culturally Responsive: Exploring the Attributes of Islamic Health Communication
SHS Web of Conferences, Vol. 33, Iss. issue, 2017-02 ,pp. :