Author: Webb Taylor
Publisher: Routledge Ltd
ISSN: 1464-5106
Source: Journal of Education Policy, Vol.20, Iss.2, 2005-03, pp. : 189-208
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
This discussion reconsiders issues of educational accountability. To do so, I report on a qualitative case study of a public elementary school that identified how a model of educational accountability threatened to punish educators through a sophisticated network of surveillance. Data indicated that district personnel used standardized tests to monitor teachers in attempts to coerce them into accepting normalizing judgments of their practice. The study also described the surveillance within the school, including strategies by curriculum developers, reading facilitators, parents, and the principal to monitor teachers' work. The analysis examined the effects surveillance had on participants and described the ways teachers amplified the effects of surveillance in the school. The analysis rethinks such punitive accountability practices and suggests replacing them with opportunities for teacher education and teacher learning.
Related content
Education + Training, Vol. 9, Iss. 9, 1993-12 ,pp. :
The choreography of accountability
Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 21, Iss. 2, 2006-03 ,pp. :
By Kemble Bruce
Education + Training, Vol. 10, Iss. 12, 1993-12 ,pp. :
Accountability and professionalism: a contradiction in terms?
By Cheng Ming
Higher Education Research & Development, Vol. 31, Iss. 6, 2012-12 ,pp. :
Accountability in education: the case of Germany
Education and the Law, Vol. 14, Iss. 1-2, 2002-03 ,pp. :