Author： Smith Ricky A.
Publisher： Water Environment Federation
ISSN： 1938-6478
Source： Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol.2003, Iss.5, 2003-01, pp. : 717-729
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Many companies have purchased a Computerized Maintenance Management System (CMMS) or Computerized Asset Management System (CAMS) with the intent that the system will be the silver bullet that solves all the maintenance problems. There are literally hundreds of information management software bundles available today that can be classified as maintenance management suites. Computerized Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) have become more sophisticated and much more capable over the last five years, yet many CMMS users feel that their systems have failed to deliver the desired results. Is this due to a preponderance of faulty software or some other, more fundamental flaw? Why aren't these companies realizing the maintenance management improvements that they anticipated? What is causing CMMS software to fail to deliver the goods and can anything be done to alleviate the problems that seem to plague so many facility maintenance departments?
Related content
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2011, Iss. 12, 2011-01 ,pp. :
Access to resources
Recommend
PROFILE - Why did The Hague Climate Conference Fail?
By Dessai S.
Environmental Politics, Vol. 10, Iss. 3, 2001-0 ,pp. :
By Stanton Amy Ekmark Melissa Peters Jim
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2002, Iss. 4, 2002-01 ,pp. :
MWRA'S CMMS OPTIMIZATION PROGRAM
By Regan Edward “Ted” Colbert John Fortin John W.
Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, Vol. 2002, Iss. 12, 2002-01 ,pp. :