Whistleblowing protections and judicial activism in the US Supreme Court

ISSN： 1752-1440

Source： Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol.8, Iss.1, 2014-03, pp. : 4-7

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments

By Mazzi Davide

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 373-385

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

JUDICIAL REVIEW AND CLOSED MATERIAL PROCEDURE IN THE SUPREME COURT

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 72, Iss. 3, 2013-11 ,pp. : 491-494

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The U.S. Supreme Court An Introductory Note

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 1971-04 ,pp. : 134-147

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

US Supreme Court Fails to Clarify ‘Standing’ Doctrine in Consumer Privacy Case

By Rotenberg Marc Thomson Aimee

European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 2016-09 ,pp. : 428-431

Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The Status of Non-Implemented EEA Law in Iceland: Lessons from the Judicial Reactions of the Supreme Court to International Law

By Hannesson Ólafur Ísberg

Nordic Journal of International Law, Vol. 80, Iss. 4, 2011-10 ,pp. : 425-458

Martinus Nijhoff

Access to resources Recommend Favorite