US Supreme Court Fails to Clarify ‘Standing’ Doctrine in Consumer Privacy Case

Publisher： Lexxion Verlagsgesellschaft mbH

E-ISSN： 2364-284x|2|3|428-431

ISSN： 2364-2831

Source： European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), Vol.2, Iss.3, 2016-09, pp. : 428-431

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The Supreme Court and information privacy

By Cate Fred H. Cate Beth E.

International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 2, Iss. 4, 2012-11 ,pp. : 255-267

Oxford University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments

By Mazzi Davide

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, Vol. 23, Iss. 4, 2010-12 ,pp. : 373-385

Springer Publishing Company

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Whistleblowing protections and judicial activism in the US Supreme Court

By Gilligan George

Law and Financial Markets Review, Vol. 8, Iss. 1, 2014-03 ,pp. : 4-7

Hart Publishing

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The U.S. Supreme Court An Introductory Note

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 29, Iss. 1, 1971-04 ,pp. : 134-147

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Habitual residence in the Supreme Court

By Hill David

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 36, Iss. 2, 2014-04 ,pp. : 211-213

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite