Related content

A defence of the received interpretation of J. S. Mill*I would like to thank Prof. Leon Ellsworth for reading an earlier draft of this paper and offering several helpful comments.

By Cupples Brian  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 50, Iss. 2, 1972-08 ,pp. : 131-137

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

“Ought” from “Is” 1 I am grateful for criticisms of an earlier version from Mr. R. M. Hare (who kindly showed me a paper of his own on the earlier part of Searle's specimen argument), Dr. A. Sloman, Mr. R. G. Swinburne, Professor A. R. White and Mr. C. J. F. Williams.

By Montague Roger  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 43, Iss. 2, 1965-01 ,pp. : 144-167

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Transworld Similarity and Transworld BeliefI would like to thank Douglas Adeney, Edwin Coleman, Bruce Langtry, Greg Restall, and Robert Stalnaker for comments on an earlier draft.

By Jackson Frank   Priest Graham   Taylor Barry  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, Iss. 1, 2004-03 ,pp. : 213-225

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Hart on rules of obligation1I wish to express my gratitude to Mr. David Schwartz and Professor Robert Summers for many helful suggestions and comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

By Siegler Frederick  

Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 45, Iss. 3, 1967-01 ,pp. : 341-355

Routledge Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Transfusions of Sovereignty: Büchner's Danton's Tod, Political Theology, and the Afterlife of LanguageI would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful criticisms, and also Márton Dornbach for his extensive commentary on an early draft of this paper.

By  

THE GERMAN QUARTERLY, Vol. 91, Iss. 1, 2018-01 ,pp. : 34-48

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite