COMPARISON OF PREDICTIVE VALIDITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF SCREENING MEASURES OF READING SKILLS

Publisher： John Wiley & Sons Inc

E-ISSN： 1520-6807|52|5|500-514

ISSN： 0033-3085

Source： PSYCHOLOGY IN THE SCHOOLS, Vol.52, Iss.5, 2015-05, pp. : 500-514

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

The reliability and validity of three‐item screening measures for burnout: Evidence from group‐employed health care practitioners in upstate New York

By  

STRESS AND HEALTH (ELECTRONIC), Vol. 34, Iss. 1, 2018-02 ,pp. : 187-193

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Thresholds and accuracy in screening tools for early detection of psychopathology

By  

THE JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, Vol. 56, Iss. 9, 2015-09 ,pp. : 936-948

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Improving the Validity of Quantitative Measures in Applied Linguistics Research1

By  

LANGUAGE LEARNING, Vol. 65, Iss. S1, 2015-06 ,pp. : 37-75

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Genetic and Environmental Etiologies of the Longitudinal Relations Between Prereading Skills and Reading

By  

CHILD DEVELOPMENT, Vol. 86, Iss. 2, 2015-03 ,pp. : 342-361

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reliability and validity of the Leuven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L‐POST)

By  

JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 9, Iss. 2, 2015-09 ,pp. : 271-298

John Wiley & Sons Inc

Access to resources Recommend Favorite