

Publisher: John Wiley & Sons Inc
E-ISSN: 1748-121x|35|2|252-279
ISSN: 0261-3875
Source: LEGAL STUDIES, Vol.35, Iss.2, 2015-06, pp. : 252-279
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
In the wake of the financial crisis, there has been much discussion about whether boards (particularly of banks) are sufficiently accountable. However, while a significant literature has grown up in relation to the study of accountability in various disciplines, particularly public administration and politics, in the field of corporate governance there has been little consideration of what accountability means or entails. This is problematic: without a clearer idea of the elusive concept of accountability, debates about board accountability may be at cross‐purposes. It will be difficult to assess whether particular corporate governance mechanisms promote board accountability, and if not, why not. The lack of clarity can also mask accountability deficits. This paper addresses this gap, setting out why accountability is important and offering an account of what accountability means in the corporate governance context, focusing on board accountability, in order to provide a framework for future research.
Related content


Clash Over Corporate Accountability and the Holocaust
German Politics & Society, Vol. 20, Iss. 3, 2002-09 ,pp. :


EC Regulation of Corporate Governance
Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 41, Iss. 3, 2012-09 ,pp. :



