Comparison of False Negative Rates Between 100% Rapid Review and 10% Random Full Rescreening as Internal Quality Control Methods in Cervical Cytology Screening

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1938-2650|53|3|271-276

ISSN： 0001-5547

Source： Acta Cytologica, Vol.53, Iss.3, 2011-02, pp. : 271-276

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 58, Iss. 5, 2014-11 ,pp. : 439-445

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapid Rescreening of Cervical Smears for Internal Quality Control

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 42, Iss. 4, 2011-08 ,pp. : 949-953

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

False Negative Rate of Cervical Cytologic Smear Screening as Determined by Rapid Rescreening

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 43, Iss. 3, 2011-07 ,pp. : 344-350

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

A Multi-Institutional Feasibility Study on the Use of Automated Screening Systems for Quality Control Rescreening of Cervical Cytology

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 60, Iss. 5, 2016-09 ,pp. : 451-457

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rescreening for Quality Control in Cytology

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 40, Iss. 1, 2011-09 ,pp. : 12-13

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite