Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

Publisher： Karger

E-ISSN： 1938-2650|58|5|439-445

ISSN： 0001-5547

Source： Acta Cytologica, Vol.58, Iss.5, 2014-11, pp. : 439-445

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Comparison of False Negative Rates Between 100% Rapid Review and 10% Random Full Rescreening as Internal Quality Control Methods in Cervical Cytology Screening

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 2011-02 ,pp. : 271-276

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapid Prescreening as a Quality Assurance Measure in Cervical Cytology

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 53, Iss. 3, 2011-02 ,pp. : 268-270

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapid Rescreening of Cervical Smears for Internal Quality Control

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 42, Iss. 4, 2011-08 ,pp. : 949-953

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Assessment of 100% Rapid Review as an Effective Tool for Internal Quality Control in Cytopathological Services

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 61, Iss. 3, 2017-05 ,pp. : 207-213

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Rapid Screening of Cervical Smears as a Method of Internal Quality Control

By  

Acta Cytologica, Vol. 41, Iss. 2, 2011-09 ,pp. : 251-260

Karger

Access to resources Recommend Favorite