Paraphyletic versus monophyletic taxa—evolutionary versus cladistic classifications

Publisher： International Association for Plant Taxonomy

ISSN： 1996-8175

Source： Taxon, Vol.55, Iss.3, 2006-08, pp. : 564-570

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted

Taxon, Vol. 54, Iss. 1, 2005-02 ,pp. : 5-8

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa

By Brummitt Richard K.

Taxon, Vol. 52, Iss. 4, 2003-11 ,pp. : 803-804

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Pursuit of a natural classification of diatoms: History, monophyly and the rejection of paraphyletic taxa

By Williams David M. Kociolek J. Patrick

European Journal of Phycology, Vol. 42, Iss. 3, 2007-08 ,pp. : 313-319

Taylor & Francis Ltd

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Character-based phylogenetic Linnaean classification: taxa should be both ranked and monophyletic

By Potter Daniel Freudenstein John V.

Taxon, Vol. 54, Iss. 4, 2005-11 ,pp. : 1033-1035

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Further arguments for the rejection of paraphyletic taxa: Veronica subgen. Pseudolysimachium (Plantaginaceae)

By Albach Dirk C.

Taxon, Vol. 57, Iss. 1, 2008-02 ,pp. : 1-6

International Association for Plant Taxonomy

Access to resources Recommend Favorite