Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1469-901x|4|2|245-251
ISSN: 0034-4125
Source: Religious Studies, Vol.4, Iss.2, 1969-04, pp. : 245-251
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
I submit as a good rule of thumb (but one which is sometimes wrong) that if a discussion of any major philosophical position or proposition ends with the conclusion that that position or proposition is ‘absurd’ or ‘meaningless’ then a mistake has been made in the discussion. The mistake often turns out to be the accuser's failure to appreciate precisely what the position being attacked really is.
Related content
J. J. C. Smart AC (16 th September 1920-6 th October 2012)
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 90, Iss. 4, 2012-12 ,pp. :
By Mackie J.L.
Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 41, Iss. 1, 1963-01 ,pp. :
Semantic Analysis of some Variants of Anderson-like Ontological Proofs
Studia Logica, Vol. 79, Iss. 3, 2005-04 ,pp. :
On some early objections to Bohm's theory
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17, Iss. 1, 2003-01 ,pp. :