The restorative logic of punishment: Another argument in favor of weak selection

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-1825|35|1|17-18

ISSN： 0140-525x

Source： Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.35, Iss.1, 2012-01, pp. : 17-18

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Abstract

Related content

Weak reciprocity alone cannot explain peer punishment

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 21-22

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Subtle ways of shifting the balance in favor of between-group selection

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 17, Iss. 4, 1994-12 ,pp. : 618-619

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Reciprocity: Weak or strong? What punishment experiments do (and do not) demonstrate

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 1-15

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Gaps in Harley's argument on evolutionarily stable learning rules and in the logic of “tit for tat”

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 7, Iss. 1, 1984-03 ,pp. : 115-116

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

The strategic logic of costly punishment necessitates natural field experiments, and at least one such experiment exists

By  

Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol. 35, Iss. 1, 2012-01 ,pp. : 31-32

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite