Tort—Inducement to break a contract—Dispute between owner and tenants—Persuasion by defendants (tenants) of other tenants not to pay their rents to owner—Held, this was not a ‘common interest’ which justified defendants

Publisher： Cambridge University Press

E-ISSN： 1469-2139|7|3|414-415

ISSN： 0008-1973

Source： Cambridge Law Journal, Vol.7, Iss.3, 1941-11, pp. : 414-415

Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.

Previous Menu Next

Related content

Tort—Alleged Inducement to Break Contract—Alleged Conspiracy to that End—Honest Mistake on Part of Defendants—Whether Proof of Damage is Required

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7, Iss. 2, 1941-07 ,pp. : 272-273

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Tort—Inducement to break a contract—Honest, but stupid and mistaken belief of defendant that his inducement was lawful held to be a defence

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, 1941-11 ,pp. : 415-416

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Frustration—The Tenants' Release?

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 40, Iss. 2, 1981-11 ,pp. : 217-219

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Will—Exercise of Special Power of Appointment—Income for Life to Two Grandchildren in Equal Shares as Tenants in Common — Whole Income to Survivor During Residue of Life— Reversionary Interest of Survivor Held to be Contingent and to be Void as Conflicting with Rule against Perpetuities.

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, 1938-11 ,pp. : 444-445

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite

Under the Volcano: Tenants, Sureties and Disclaimer

By  

Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 54, Iss. 2, 1995-07 ,pp. : 253-255

Cambridge University Press

Access to resources Recommend Favorite