Publisher: Cambridge University Press
E-ISSN: 1537-5943|105|1|151-165
ISSN: 0003-0554
Source: American Political Science Review, Vol.105, Iss.1, 2011-02, pp. : 151-165
Disclaimer: Any content in publications that violate the sovereignty, the constitution or regulations of the PRC is not accepted or approved by CNPIEC.
Abstract
Identifying policy status quo locations is a precondition for testing key predictions of many spatial models of legislative politics, but such measures have proved to be extremely difficult to construct. This study applies a novel technique that measures policy locations in relation to legislators’ preferences. The resulting status quo estimates allow for a direct test of the policy consequences predicted by pivotal politics and party cartel theories of legislative politics. The empirical tests indicate that parties interact with pivotal politics to contribute to policy gridlock and shape policy change. By bringing pressure to bear on pivotal politics “pivots” and by blocking policy changes that would “roll” the party, parties increase the range of policies subject to gridlock in the American political system.
Related content
Germany in NATO: The Status Quo Ally
Survival, Vol. 54, Iss. 3, 2012-06 ,pp. :
Status Quo Bias in Ballot Wording
Journal of Experimental Political Science, Vol. 4, Iss. 2, 2017-11 ,pp. :
Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy
American Political Science Review, Vol. 71, Iss. 4, 1977-12 ,pp. :
Do Religious Institutions Support Violence or the Status Quo?
By Fox Jonathan
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, Vol. 22, Iss. 2, 1999-04 ,pp. :
Status Quo Preferences and Disputes Short of War
International Interactions, Vol. 33, Iss. 3, 2007-07 ,pp. :